<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coles vs Woolworths – Explaining Sales Differences</title>
	<link>http://dsanalytics.com/dsblog/coles-vs-woolworths-%e2%80%93-explaining-sales-differences_115</link>
	<description>Data Analytics- the art and science of analyzing data</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John Aitchison</title>
		<link>http://dsanalytics.com/dsblog/coles-vs-woolworths-%e2%80%93-explaining-sales-differences_115#comment-59</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dsanalytics.com/dsblog/coles-vs-woolworths-%e2%80%93-explaining-sales-differences_115#comment-59</guid>
					<description>more anecdote

http://highriser.blogspot.com/2006/02/coles-v-safeway.html

The internet is a great way to develop the concourse, the set of plausible factor, the hypothesis space</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more anecdote</p>
<p><a href='http://highriser.blogspot.com/2006/02/coles-v-safeway.html' rel='nofollow'>http://highriser.blogspot.com/2006/02/coles-v-safeway.html</a></p>
<p>The internet is a great way to develop the concourse, the set of plausible factor, the hypothesis space
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Aitchison</title>
		<link>http://dsanalytics.com/dsblog/coles-vs-woolworths-%e2%80%93-explaining-sales-differences_115#comment-58</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dsanalytics.com/dsblog/coles-vs-woolworths-%e2%80%93-explaining-sales-differences_115#comment-58</guid>
					<description>there is some more talk on this issue (mostly anecdotal, addressed to possible plausible explanators rather than to modelling) at 

http://www.danielbowen.com/2006/03/08/coles-vs-safeway/

and

http://diffusionblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/coles-without-myer-still-short-on.html

That is of interest, but proposing possible causal factors is a long way from actually getting any quantification, and may even be a retrograde step (the problem then looks very very complex, when it may not be)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is some more talk on this issue (mostly anecdotal, addressed to possible plausible explanators rather than to modelling) at </p>
<p><a href='http://www.danielbowen.com/2006/03/08/coles-vs-safeway/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.danielbowen.com/2006/03/08/coles-vs-safeway/</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href='http://diffusionblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/coles-without-myer-still-short-on.html' rel='nofollow'>http://diffusionblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/coles-without-myer-still-short-on.html</a></p>
<p>That is of interest, but proposing possible causal factors is a long way from actually getting any quantification, and may even be a retrograde step (the problem then looks very very complex, when it may not be)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
